KitKat

Mar. 15th, 2006 09:58 am
webofevil: (Default)
[personal profile] webofevil
Last night I joined the select band of people who have enjoyed the exquisite pleasures of a waferless Kit-Kat. Don’t get me wrong—if they brought out an official waferless Kit-Kat tomorrow no-one would be the slightest bit excited. It’s not that good. It’s only the rarity, the almost forbidden-fruit quality, and the puzzling questions it briefly raises about how Kit-Kats are made in the first place that give them their star quality, although I also choose to believe it means I’ll now have seven years’ good luck.

But raise those questions it did, and, some brief research later, I had had them answered: Kit-Kat wafers are fired at enormous velocity into huge vehicle-mounted vertical panels of chocolate. It’s no surprise, therefore, that sometimes a wafer will miss.




It also turns out that, intent on not being outdone by Nestlé, Mars Inc. spent the 1980s concentrating on research and development, with impressive results:

  

Schrodinger's KitKat

Date: 2006-03-15 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] internetsdairy.livejournal.com
Then they fire the Maltesers through a pair of slats - they can behave as both orange and peanut at the same time!

Date: 2006-03-15 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com
Maltesers are almost perfectly spherical, yet at the point of creation they are covered with melted chocolate. Why do they not have a flat bit on the bottom, where they rested after or during the melted-chocolate-adding bit of the job? If they were suspended using air jets, the chocolate would ripple. I have conducted experiments to answer this question using air-jets, rolling-while-adding-chocolate; adding-chocolate-before-plunging-into-cold-water[1] and all sorts of other things.

EH?

My tentative conclusion is that each Malteser is individually polished by gnomes.

[1] as we all know: this is impossible. We have all had a Malteser at some point which was incompletely covered with chocolate and yet whose honeycomb centre was in no way affected. Contact with water would cause instant core meltdown.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-03-15 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com
I KNEW IT.

Not the Archimedean Screw bit (although: nice thinking). I mean I knew the gnomes smoked, the little bastards.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-03-15 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com
It's wrong if that turns me on, isn't it?
(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-03-15 01:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com
Oops.

It's just the cigarettes, I swear. I don't have a thing for chocolatey gnomes.

Date: 2006-03-15 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com
MALTESERS!

Revels on the other hand are made by trained Palestinian rock throwers, who launch handfuls of assorted fondant centres through a chocolate waterfall.

Date: 2006-03-15 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com
I don't know if you saw [livejournal.com profile] pipistrellus's LJ, but I'm holding you responsible for my newly developed addiction to Maltesers. I pigged out on most of a large bag of them only last night.

Like the icon - I trust there will be an accompanying "TART" one?

Date: 2006-03-15 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com
On the weekend I actually, in a bowl, put 2 bags of Maltesers, 2 bags of Revels and 1 bag of Minstrels (all small bags, I hasten to add). These I ate whilst witnessing the Revenge of the Smiths, with Morrissey as Count Dooku, Johnny Marr as Lando Calrissian etc.

Date: 2006-03-15 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com
Yay! (Your Malteser/Revel/Minstrels plan sounds brilliant. I may have to emulate it this weekend.)
(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-03-15 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com
All pies are savoury. Fact.

Date: 2006-03-15 02:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com
I'm getting t-shirts made of this one.

Date: 2006-03-15 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"Ceci".

Date: 2006-03-15 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com
Blimey, I didn't remember that. No wonder I got a D for my French A level.

Date: 2006-03-15 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com
I'm not even sure it's true. I just said it so that I wouldn't need to change the icon again.

Date: 2006-03-15 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com
Bah. You chancer. You can keep your rotten pie, or flan, or whatever it is.

Date: 2006-03-15 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com
It turns out it is true. I am teh Frenchness.

Date: 2006-03-15 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com
I know it's taking pedantry to the nth degree, but - well, we're all about getting the pie/flan thing correct, right? Anyway, the cedilla may be left of a capital "C", but it doesn't have to be, and apparently this no more true of the cedilla than any other French accent (in the punctuation, rather than the Clouseau, sense).

November 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 06:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios