webofevil: (Default)
webofevil ([personal profile] webofevil) wrote2006-03-15 09:58 am
Entry tags:

KitKat

Last night I joined the select band of people who have enjoyed the exquisite pleasures of a waferless Kit-Kat. Don’t get me wrong—if they brought out an official waferless Kit-Kat tomorrow no-one would be the slightest bit excited. It’s not that good. It’s only the rarity, the almost forbidden-fruit quality, and the puzzling questions it briefly raises about how Kit-Kats are made in the first place that give them their star quality, although I also choose to believe it means I’ll now have seven years’ good luck.

But raise those questions it did, and, some brief research later, I had had them answered: Kit-Kat wafers are fired at enormous velocity into huge vehicle-mounted vertical panels of chocolate. It’s no surprise, therefore, that sometimes a wafer will miss.




It also turns out that, intent on not being outdone by Nestlé, Mars Inc. spent the 1980s concentrating on research and development, with impressive results:

  

Schrodinger's KitKat

[identity profile] internetsdairy.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 10:29 am (UTC)(link)
Then they fire the Maltesers through a pair of slats - they can behave as both orange and peanut at the same time!

[identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 11:00 am (UTC)(link)
Maltesers are almost perfectly spherical, yet at the point of creation they are covered with melted chocolate. Why do they not have a flat bit on the bottom, where they rested after or during the melted-chocolate-adding bit of the job? If they were suspended using air jets, the chocolate would ripple. I have conducted experiments to answer this question using air-jets, rolling-while-adding-chocolate; adding-chocolate-before-plunging-into-cold-water[1] and all sorts of other things.

EH?

My tentative conclusion is that each Malteser is individually polished by gnomes.

[1] as we all know: this is impossible. We have all had a Malteser at some point which was incompletely covered with chocolate and yet whose honeycomb centre was in no way affected. Contact with water would cause instant core meltdown.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I KNEW IT.

Not the Archimedean Screw bit (although: nice thinking). I mean I knew the gnomes smoked, the little bastards.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It's wrong if that turns me on, isn't it?
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 01:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Oops.

It's just the cigarettes, I swear. I don't have a thing for chocolatey gnomes.

[identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 11:17 am (UTC)(link)
MALTESERS!

Revels on the other hand are made by trained Palestinian rock throwers, who launch handfuls of assorted fondant centres through a chocolate waterfall.

[identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 11:52 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if you saw [livejournal.com profile] pipistrellus's LJ, but I'm holding you responsible for my newly developed addiction to Maltesers. I pigged out on most of a large bag of them only last night.

Like the icon - I trust there will be an accompanying "TART" one?

[identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 12:21 pm (UTC)(link)
On the weekend I actually, in a bowl, put 2 bags of Maltesers, 2 bags of Revels and 1 bag of Minstrels (all small bags, I hasten to add). These I ate whilst witnessing the Revenge of the Smiths, with Morrissey as Count Dooku, Johnny Marr as Lando Calrissian etc.

[identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Yay! (Your Malteser/Revel/Minstrels plan sounds brilliant. I may have to emulate it this weekend.)
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm getting t-shirts made of this one.

(Anonymous) 2006-03-15 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
"Ceci".

[identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Blimey, I didn't remember that. No wonder I got a D for my French A level.

[identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not even sure it's true. I just said it so that I wouldn't need to change the icon again.

[identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 04:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Bah. You chancer. You can keep your rotten pie, or flan, or whatever it is.

[identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
It turns out it is true. I am teh Frenchness.

[identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com 2006-03-15 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I know it's taking pedantry to the nth degree, but - well, we're all about getting the pie/flan thing correct, right? Anyway, the cedilla may be left of a capital "C", but it doesn't have to be, and apparently this no more true of the cedilla than any other French accent (in the punctuation, rather than the Clouseau, sense).