KitKat

Mar. 15th, 2006 09:58 am
webofevil: (Default)
[personal profile] webofevil
Last night I joined the select band of people who have enjoyed the exquisite pleasures of a waferless Kit-Kat. Don’t get me wrong—if they brought out an official waferless Kit-Kat tomorrow no-one would be the slightest bit excited. It’s not that good. It’s only the rarity, the almost forbidden-fruit quality, and the puzzling questions it briefly raises about how Kit-Kats are made in the first place that give them their star quality, although I also choose to believe it means I’ll now have seven years’ good luck.

But raise those questions it did, and, some brief research later, I had had them answered: Kit-Kat wafers are fired at enormous velocity into huge vehicle-mounted vertical panels of chocolate. It’s no surprise, therefore, that sometimes a wafer will miss.




It also turns out that, intent on not being outdone by Nestlé, Mars Inc. spent the 1980s concentrating on research and development, with impressive results:

  

Schrodinger's KitKat

Date: 2006-03-15 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] internetsdairy.livejournal.com
Then they fire the Maltesers through a pair of slats - they can behave as both orange and peanut at the same time!

Date: 2006-03-15 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com
Maltesers are almost perfectly spherical, yet at the point of creation they are covered with melted chocolate. Why do they not have a flat bit on the bottom, where they rested after or during the melted-chocolate-adding bit of the job? If they were suspended using air jets, the chocolate would ripple. I have conducted experiments to answer this question using air-jets, rolling-while-adding-chocolate; adding-chocolate-before-plunging-into-cold-water[1] and all sorts of other things.

EH?

My tentative conclusion is that each Malteser is individually polished by gnomes.

[1] as we all know: this is impossible. We have all had a Malteser at some point which was incompletely covered with chocolate and yet whose honeycomb centre was in no way affected. Contact with water would cause instant core meltdown.

Date: 2006-03-15 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-cornfedpi814.livejournal.com
MALTESERS!

Revels on the other hand are made by trained Palestinian rock throwers, who launch handfuls of assorted fondant centres through a chocolate waterfall.

November 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 03:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios