L'Assemblée Nationale
Nov. 29th, 2005 10:16 am
From the official record of the French National Assembly, 24 November:
M. Noël Mamère: Democratic debate requires respect for others: I ask you to apologise publicly for the remarks you have just made in your position as an MP. I am defending freedom, and do not regard myself as a threat to our country! If you consider, Mr Sartrosi, that defending fundamental freedoms constitutes a threat to the republican pact, you have destroyed the equilibrium! We do not have the same idea of democracy and republican values! Your remarks have wounded me (Exclamations from the UMP benches) and I solemnly ask you to withdraw them! Respect democratic debate, to which I am contributing like you, even if I am isolated! Perhaps you believe I am wrong, but let us wait for the verdict of the electorate—and of history!This English "translation" (Babelfished, then panelbeaten) doesn't quite do justice to the original; as
M. Rapporteur: I had occasion to tell you this morning...
M. Noël Mamère: All the wonderful things you think of me!
M. Rapporteur: ... the respect I have for you as a Member of Parliament. With regard to Article 7, I believed I had reassured all and sundry. Words can be inflammatory, and I shall bear that in mind: your interpretation of the text is exaggerated. Let us return to the true meaning of this text, as I did in amendment 31, without ending up with such fevered exchanges! Recognize, Mr Mamère, that you are not helping the progress of our work... We are all devoted to fundamental, public and individual freedoms: let us stick to the text!
M. President: I’d like to point out that this was only a clarifying amendment... (Laughter on various benches)
Crucially, Les Comptes Rendus don't have the near-embargo on exciting punctuation that we do over here. At the first sign of trouble they break out the exclamation marks. (It could even be argued that they maybe get a little carried away.) Also they have stage directions, which Hansard is sorely lacking. It creates far more of an atmosphere when you know that there were "Murmurs on the UMP benches", or, as here, "Exclamations".
EDIT: Thanks to everyone who helped M. Mamère's interjection become a reality. You know who you are. You guys!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:37 am (UTC)But it does us a disservice. In 1999 the Earl of Burford, in protest at the imminent sacking of almost all the hereditaries from the Lords, leapt onto the Woolsack at the start of a session and proclaimed that pretty much everyone in the room was a traitor. What went into Hansard? "[Interruption.]" When lesbians abseiled from the Strangers' Gallery into Black Rod's lap, what does Hansard inform us happened? Fucking "[Interruption.]". This means it is not a complete journal of record.
Similarly, when Otis Ferry and his band of numpties spilled onto the floor of the Commons, it's a disgrace that the cameras were switched off. If they had had more sinister intent than simply demonstrating that they were miffed, and had actually attacked someone, the footage would make superb prima facie evidence for a court case, and posterity would also be pretty grateful. (Can you imagine the police's response to "Well, I was filming everything, but then it looked like it might start to kick off, so I switched everything off and then fainted"?)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:51 am (UTC)"I had occasion to say to you this morning..."
"All the lovely things you thought of me!"
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:40 am (UTC)"All the lovely things you thought of me!"
is right. It's definitely the imperfect, rather than the subjunctive.
Translation software like babelfish gets confused by the juxtaposition of "bien" and "que", which it translates as the informal "although".
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 12:46 pm (UTC)"it's quite old fashioned:
'all the good things that you think of when you think of me'."
It's some way off from "the effluxion of time", isn't it?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:11 am (UTC)Cricket drinks are on the 13th December in the Priory, if you fancy coming along. It's just drinks, and maybe a curry.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:26 am (UTC)That's a Tuesday, isn't it? I'll be working as per, but thanks anyway...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 02:56 pm (UTC)"All the good that you think of me. Sort of. It's quite flowery and poetic."
So that was useful.