webofevil: (Default)
(Initially a response to this post on [livejournal.com profile] ultra_lilac’s journal, itself a response to this article on the normalisation of porn.)

> like all porn, [lads’ magazines] commodify women.

In itself, the sight of two people having sex shouldn’t necessarily be exploitative. If they’re fucking sensually and consensually, neither of them need be “commodified” by being seen by others; the use of “babes” on mag covers and mobiles objectifies those women far more by reducing them to mere wallpaper, things to gaze at but not at all engage with.

But the nature of almost all pornography isn’t a cheerful celebration of an intimate act; it’s an unashamed exercise in degradation that corrodes any attempt to reclaim it that involves labelling it “empowering”. The tradition of giving the porn actresses star billing while reducing the men to mere bit parts is simply a sop, a scraggy bouquet thrown to these women as an afterthought at the same time as they’re being labelled whores, sluts and skanks. It isn’t just porn’s production values that have moved on since the 1970s; its language and very nature have developed a scabrous intent of their own. Many websites appear to cater to men who want to teach these women a lesson; somehow punish them for having been attractive and self-assured in the first place.

I don’t think that reflects the intent of every man who goes looking for this stuff—it’s the images that get surfed for, not the copy. It doesn’t even necessarily reflect the private opinions of everyone involved in making it; it’s more about the porn industry’s image of itself as a rebellious outsider bent on stirring up trouble. This, despite its gazillion-dollar turnover. As Jon Stewart said about the Republicans, “When will you realise that you’re not a rag-tag band of rebels fighting the Empire? You are the Empire.”

Whatever the reason for it, this destructive depiction of the actresses (who are, after all, the industry’s most easily replaceable resource—it’s really tough to find a guy who (a) is sufficiently hung and (b) can get it up on cue, but abused teenage girls fling themselves at the industry’s doorstep every week of the year) demeans everyone involved. For a woman who quite likes watching people have sex, how much fun is it to be told repeatedly that your desires make you worthless and that you should be punished just for your gender?

This attitude extends to all widely available porn, not just the abusive freakshow gonzo shit (how many live dwarfs can she shove up her arse, etc). The more people are exposed, not just to the images, but to this view of sex in general and women—I’m sorry, “bitches”—specifically, the more corrosive the effect. Popbitch giggled a while back about the huge increase in Icelandic teenage girls having to have medical treatment because they’d been trying the hardcore anal sex they’d all seen on the internet. I’m in my early thirties; I can only guess what it must be like for someone half my age growing up in an environment where this stuff is presented as normal, without any wider experience that would put it in its context as a sustained lie for commercial gain.

Basically, I would like to like porn more than I do. I would like for it to reflect something of the intimacy and reciprocity of real, enjoyable, not-for-profit sex. But it doesn’t because it doesn’t need to, and, realistically, it’s not going to start.
webofevil: (oy vey)
An exciting new theory from my esteemed colleague on the internal dynamics within 21st-century laureates the Black–Eyed Peas that puts a whole new slant on the execrable My Humps. The men in the group still resent the fact that no-one gave even the merest hint of a fart about what they were doing until “Fergie” joined the line-up and gave people something to look at other than this:


Ooh, Christ

My esteemed colleague claims to have stumbled entirely by accident upon a TV interview with the group minus Fergie, and says the bitterness was palpable when they were invited by an interviewer to revisit once again the fact that they had been going precisely nowhere before A&R took them in hand, amputated their last vestigial dreams of credibility and persuaded America’s Least Convincing Latina to leap on to the tailgate of their rubbish rap bus:



So, this theory goes, the men, wallowing in accumulated resentment, write ever more humiliating, degrading and misogynist things for her to sing as payback for her success. She, on the other hand, laughs at them, performs it all cheerfully, picks up her ever-larger cheques and buys stuff. This makes them even angrier, and the process continues apace.

I’d quite like to think this was true. For a start, it would explain how she manages to perform their gibberish with a smile on her face.

Feminisn't

Dec. 7th, 2005 10:06 am
webofevil: (deck the halls)
Women! It’s a well-remarked phenomenon that many of you feel uncomfortable with the tag “feminist”. This might explain why, deep down, you find yourself automatically rejecting the label:
“The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practise witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.”

Pat Robertson

Wow. Is that really what you're all up to?
webofevil: (Default)
[3 December 1957]

Earl Ferrers: I have the idea of your Lordships' House becoming a repository for over-exuberant female politicians, and unfortunately we are unable to elevate them further, for that prerogative rests with the Almighty. Frankly, I find women in politics highly distasteful. In general, they are organising, they are pushing and they are commanding. Some of them do not even know where loyalty to their country lies... It is generally accepted, for better or worse, that a man's judgment is generally more logical and less tempestuous than that of a woman. Why then should we encourage women to eat their way, like acid into metal, into positions of trust and responsibility which previously men have held? If we allow women in this House, where will this emancipation end?... I feel sure that nine out of ten noble Lords have in their heart... that we like women; we admire them; sometimes we even grow fond of them; but we do not like them here.
webofevil: (Default)
Only women are equipped to cope with the sheer disappointment of herbal tea.

"Mmm, what a delicious-smelling beverage," says the brain. "I'll wager that makes for an unbelievably rich taste sensa—oh. Oh."

Men, at this point, will usually give up and try and wash away the taste with something more pleasant, like Dettol, but women plough doggedly on, slurping away at the stuff and protesting unconvincingly that a drink really only needs to SMELL great.
webofevil: (Default)
An Indian woman who was raped has rejected a marriage proposal from the rapist, calling the idea “horrible”.

She had been asked in court whether she would accept the proposal from her attacker who had hoped it might lower his sentence.

The convicted rapist said he was offering to marry the woman because the stigma of rape in India meant no one else would.

Following the rejection, the court sentenced the rapist to life in prison.

Women’s groups expressed disgust at the request and disappointment that the court had allowed the petition to be made. [BBC]
To be fair, there’s still a fair few on our own judicial benches who would think that was an entirely reasonable offer.

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 07:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios