Feminisn't

[webofevil]

Women! It’s a well-remarked phenomenon that many of you feel uncomfortable with the tag “feminist”. This might explain why, deep down, you find yourself automatically rejecting the label:

“The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practise witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.”

Pat Robertson

Wow. Is that really what you're all up to?

Comments

[offensive-mango.livejournal.com]

Pat Robertson is a fuxxing cvnt, and you can quote me on that (if you can work out how to pronounce it).

[offensive-mango.livejournal.com]

BTW he's referring to abortion, of course (though you probably worked that out).

[alfaguru.livejournal.com]

Only "kill" their children? I thought they subjected them to satanic abuse before eating them. Has Pat been got at by the PC lobby?

[verlaine.livejournal.com]

Can you deny that the infanticidal Medea is a proto-feminist icon[*]? WELL CAN YOU?

* written, er, by a man

[chiller.livejournal.com]

Jesus.

I'm lining up a thermos flask as I type.

[clanwilliam.livejournal.com]

Well, of course it is. Why do you think so many of us *are* feminists?

[arampus.livejournal.com]

Pat!

[webofevil.livejournal.com]

Indeed. Pat! (http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/religion/televangelists/pat-robertson/)

[arampus.livejournal.com]

Clicking on that gets me this: "The site you have attempted to access has been blocked because it is considered inappropriate for office use."

But what if, for example, we need to order stationery from someone who requires proof that Pat Roberts is a unconscionable moron before surrendering crucial OHMS envelopes or treasury tags of the required length? Then I would say that link is probably very appropriate, you silly Cab. Off. censor man.

Not you. Him.

[webofevil.livejournal.com]

To be scrupulously fair to the Cab. Off. censor man, the link is to Rotten.com, which, while it does devote a special non-horrific section to detailing the lives and proclivities of certain televangelists, for the most part carries images that will make your eyes pop. People from all over the world sneak photos from active police files and path labs onto the site that will supply a source of nightmares for the most jaded palate; there's variants of "porn" that will once and for all destroy your faith in your fellow man; pictures from the scene of nightmarish accidents taken by enthusiastic bystanders with far stronger stomachs than mine—it prides itself on taking a look at humanity's dark underbelly, and does so with such success that I found it was the first time I ever had my general curiosity not only sated, but actually discouraged. I actually love the fact that Rotten.com exists, but really don't feel the need to explore its picture galleries ever again.