(no subject)
Dec. 1st, 2011 02:08 pm
I don't have a problem with Clarkson's comments yesterday, since if he thinks he'll have time to get off a single shot before I implement my plans for him, he's even more deluded than I thought.[1]There's a timely reminder from Michael White today of what to bear in mind whenever Clarkson takes up the mantle of "mouthpiece of the toiling classes":
[This] is not the lad's first foray into populist rightwing politics on behalf of north Oxfordshire's self-styled media elite, which gathers around Rebekah Brooks' Christmas hearth to roast a few peasants Guardian]
[1] Note to Clarkson's lawyers: obviously my plans for him consist exclusively of feeding him delicious cakes. And asking him if he's got any more mistresses no-one's allowed to talk about.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-01 09:00 pm (UTC)So in the transcript the One Show team decided to put online:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/dec/01/jeremy-clarkson-one-show-strike
He starts off by saying that the strikes were great because there was no traffic and then justifies his viscious fascist tirade on the grounds of "balance".
What a wally, eh?