(no subject)
Dec. 1st, 2011 02:08 pm
I don't have a problem with Clarkson's comments yesterday, since if he thinks he'll have time to get off a single shot before I implement my plans for him, he's even more deluded than I thought.[1]There's a timely reminder from Michael White today of what to bear in mind whenever Clarkson takes up the mantle of "mouthpiece of the toiling classes":
[This] is not the lad's first foray into populist rightwing politics on behalf of north Oxfordshire's self-styled media elite, which gathers around Rebekah Brooks' Christmas hearth to roast a few peasants Guardian]
[1] Note to Clarkson's lawyers: obviously my plans for him consist exclusively of feeding him delicious cakes. And asking him if he's got any more mistresses no-one's allowed to talk about.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-01 08:55 pm (UTC)Why are you bringing Al Murray into this? He's brilliant? His right-wing rants are quite clearly self-deprecating and satirical. Plus in recent years he did a programme on TV exposing the typical myths Brits have about Germans.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/2010/dec/02/al-murrays-german-adventure
I don't think Ricky Gervais is anything like so obviously satirical and I think Jeremy Clarkson is genuinely right-wing. So I guess that's the difference. *shrugs* (I must admit I'm not an expert. One night I rented Ricky Gervais' stand up and when I got home, without even putting it on, I suddenly realised I couldn't stomach watching it. Lol. - Though admittedly I'm quite glad that he's been welcomed back to host this year's Golden Globes since without his "shocking" commentary I'd have no interest in that awards ceremony whatsoever.)
no subject
Date: 2011-12-01 09:33 pm (UTC)