Date: 2008-11-19 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strictlytrue.livejournal.com
I actually did find myself wondering whether anyone would take the "nanny state gone mad" line on this. Now I know. What about the workers?

We think they're trying to do it through the back door

Fnurk.

Date: 2008-11-19 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] webofevil.livejournal.com
I'll be honest, I was more stunned at what looks like an award-winning unintentional double entendre than the substance of what she was saying; ultimately I would expect the collectives to be concerned about their members not being pigeonholed as victims, although it would probably be preferable if they acknowledged that trafficking and forced prostitution are as much of a problem as they are.

Date: 2008-11-19 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] webofevil.livejournal.com
And if it wasn't unintentional then she said it for a bet, which suggests she's not taking this quite as seriously as she lets on.

Date: 2008-11-19 02:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lebeautemps.livejournal.com
Back door? Hah hhaa!

Date: 2008-11-19 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uniquefergus.livejournal.com
Back door? I prefer Belgian Biscuit.

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 02:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios