Well, it could be argued that he is important, from a 'historical anals' point of view. Some of the mind-bogglingly poor decisions he's made within his role 'in the media' will become part of British History. So, in that way I guess he's important. ;)
Piers is one of those people, like Boris, who are fantastic value when they're out of power, but terrifying and loathsome when they've got power. His book's a bloody good read.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 03:30 pm (UTC)