The UK Treasury is facing a £3.5m bill because of VAT wrongly imposed on a Marks and Spencer teacake, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.
Customers paid VAT for 20 years before the authorities accepted the product [wrongly classed as a biscuit] was a cake, which does not command VAT. [BBC]
Exactly. How does the consumer benefit from this? Also, were Tunnock's or other teacake brands for some reason classified differently? Perplexing stuff, the biscuit cake industry.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:23 pm (UTC)-x-
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:59 pm (UTC)biscuitcake industry.no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 02:15 pm (UTC)http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com/jaffajudgement/
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 02:28 pm (UTC)oh dere lord, don't start all that again...
Date: 2008-04-10 04:07 pm (UTC)SURELY IT IS A PIE!!!!!!Re: oh dere lord, don't start all that again...
Date: 2008-04-14 02:53 pm (UTC)Fruit = tart
Chocolate = tort
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 08:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 08:09 am (UTC)