Teacake

Apr. 10th, 2008 02:01 pm
webofevil: (Default)
[personal profile] webofevil
The UK Treasury is facing a £3.5m bill because of VAT wrongly imposed on a Marks and Spencer teacake, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.

Customers paid VAT for 20 years before the authorities accepted the product [wrongly classed as a biscuit] was a cake, which does not command VAT. [BBC]

Date: 2008-04-10 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publicansdecoy.livejournal.com
Will M&S be returning the VAT to its customers?

-x-

Date: 2008-04-10 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hoshuteki.livejournal.com
Exactly. How does the consumer benefit from this? Also, were Tunnock's or other teacake brands for some reason classified differently? Perplexing stuff, the biscuit cake industry.

Date: 2008-04-10 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] g0ldt00th.livejournal.com
This reminds me of the Jaffa Cake case from a couple of years ago:

http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com/jaffajudgement/

Date: 2008-04-10 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com
Obligatory poll here, including discussion of the poppadom question.

Re: oh dere lord, don't start all that again...

Date: 2008-04-14 02:53 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Savoury = pie
Fruit = tart
Chocolate = tort

Date: 2008-04-10 06:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lowlowprices.livejournal.com
This still doesn't solve the Wagon Wheel conundrum: a wagon-based wheel snack or a wheel-based wagon snack?

Date: 2008-04-11 08:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lebeautemps.livejournal.com
What what WHAT??

Date: 2008-04-11 08:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lebeautemps.livejournal.com
M&S need to run a free prize draw for a packet of these things, you know, for interested parties. Nom nom nom.

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 11:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios