"No thank you Satan"
Oct. 18th, 2007 12:45 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Of all the tribulations that have faced Christianity through the ages, surely the greatest has to be the modernisation of the spelling of one of the translations of its holy book:
This particular edition of the Cambridge Bible that calls itself a King James Bible is not genuine. IT’S A COUNTERFEIT! It’s not the Bible of my forefathers!
Here are some of the changes I located: Asswaged has been changed to assuaged. Basons has been changed to basins. Chesnut has been changed to chestnut. Cloke has been changed to cloak. Enquire has been changed to inquire. Further has been changed to farther. Jubile has been changed to jubilee. Intreat has been changed to entreat. Morter has been changed to mortar. Ought has been changed to aught, and rereward has been changed to rearward.Brother Nic, why get so upset? These are just minor changes in spelling. Well maybe they are, but have you never read “a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?” You see I believe God wrote the Bible through sinful men. I believe God copied the Bible through sinful men. I believe God translated the Bible through sinful men, and I believe God edited (purified) the Bible through sinful men. So therefore I believe God gave us the exact words in the exact order He wanted us to have them in. If that’s the case then He spelled the words exactly the way He wanted to spell them, and gave them to us in a pure language, and that language is the standard text of the King James Bible. This is the Bible that has stood the test of time without any editing whatsoever ... Once you modernize spelling, change capital letters to lower case letters and add hyphens, you are changing the standard text in order to please modern society ...
One thing a lot of them do is change the spelling of words that end with the letters o-u-r to the more modern American spelling of o-r ... Now the very worst of this battle of o-u-r vs o-r comes when dealing with the only begotten Son of God, our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. The modern day counterfeiters have changed Saviour to Savior. They have given us a six-letter Savior in place of a seven-letter Saviour. In Bible numerics seven is the number of completeness, purity, and spiritual perfection. On the other hand six is the number of man which is earthly not heavenly. Everyone has heard of 666. It has a bad connotation and is not highly esteemed in Bible numerics.
The seven-letter Saviour is the only begotten Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ. The six-letter Savior is the son of perdition, the anti-Christ. He wants to be like the most High (Isaiah 14:14), but not in a good way, but in an evil way. He is not a follower. He’s a counterfeiter. Therefore his final destination is the lake of fire. The new versions, along with the new age movement, and some of the King James Bible counterfeits are preparing the way for this six-letter so called Savior. That's the way he will spell his name, S-a-v-i-o-r not S-a-v-i-o-u-r. No thank you Satan.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 12:11 pm (UTC)Speaking of "a little leaven," have a look at A Little Leaven. I've syndicated them at
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 12:13 pm (UTC)Posted by: Caleb | October 16, 2007 at 04:55 PM
--------
I say it over & over
Where is the fear of the Lord???
What happened to God being Holy????
We seem to be worse than the days of Noah!!!!!!
Posted by: Shma | October 16, 2007 at 09:05 PM
--------
what's a pez dispenser?
Posted by: Rita M. | October 16, 2007 at 10:09 PM
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 12:50 pm (UTC)There's something about the idea of an all-mighty being getting upset over capital letters that is just far too amusing...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 01:46 pm (UTC)I believe God edited (purified) the Bible through sinful men
But not these sinful men. A different bunch of sinful men. ... Glad we've got that cleared up.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 10:02 am (UTC)No, that would be Jizz.