Apr. 30th, 2005

webofevil: (Default)
I’ve had food poisoning before; you know, the proper kind, the lightning strike, the near-fever where the room’s spinning and you’re seeing stars. Your body is engaged in total war against alien invaders, and the sheer bewildering violence of it all would almost be quite exciting if it didn’t mean you felt like death. That’s food poisoning.

This, however, is just rubbish. Most likely it’s campylobacter, the Jon Culshaw to salmonella’s Rory Bremner*. Apparently this is its standard MO—a couple of days’ hardcore nastiness at the start, which then abates a bit, leaving only some gastric grumbling, a high-ish temperature you can’t shift and overall an indefinable feeling of somehow being kind of ill. Also, it means you can’t concentrate on a damn thing. I’ve had to take the week off work, which is unfortunate when you’re paid by the hour.

This bacterium has sought asylum in me after entering illegally in—almost certainly—a Ginster’s chicken and mushroom slice. (Chicken is campylobacter’s traditional haunt, and the slice was the only chicken I had eaten all day. In your face, Ginster’s’s lawyers.) It’s a useful reminder of just how much of the national flock is infected with a startling variety of shit like this, thanks mainly to battery farming. Yet when challenged on this and related subjects (growth hormones, overuse of antibiotics, feeding herbivores to other herbivores, the usual), agribusiness is always quick to point the finger back at us: “You’re the consumer. You wanted cheap food. You did this.” This is bogus non-logic and we shouldn’t accept it. We would have been foolish to request that they jeopardise our health, so we didn’t. However, almost their every cost-cutting development does exactly that. Few of us have the pathological lack of affect required to ask them to brutalise their livestock so that it becomes almost unrecognisable as the animal it started out as, but this they do with alarming zeal.

Like paparazzi and the Ministry of Defence, the agribusiness industry is in profound denial about what it does and why it does it. And partly as a result (and also as a result of my lazy decision to eat a shoddy processed product; I don’t deny I’m complicit) I’ve been sat around for a week now, feeling like a confused drunk old man. Hopefully by the Bank Holiday I’ll be well enough to feel that way because of actual drink.


* Lazenby to Connery, Andy Dick to Steve Martin, Putin to Stalin, Richard Reid to bin Laden, etc
webofevil: (Default)
I've just found out that my brother-in-law’s brother (what does that make him? Brother-in-law once removed?) was recently on a Norwegian reality show. Following the format of a British show (which itself probably ripped off an American one), it involved twelve couples all helping to build a “dream” house, but every week one of the couples would be voted off and would walk away with nothing, until the final couple won the house. He and his partner made it to the eighth week.

Obviously, as with any show that involves a high-stakes prize and lots of voting, things get unpleasant at times. However in this case, and I have yet to establish exactly what happened, my brother-in-law-in-law’s machinations in the house look like they will result in a court case. Six of the couples who got voted off intend to sue him, his partner, another couple and the TV company.

Anyone who speaks Scando can find details here.

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 16th, 2025 08:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios