Be sure - it is enough

[webofevil]

The following instructive picture arrived in the latest batch of spam, entitled “Separate yourself from other men”.



I’m unsure if the first girl’s complaining, while the second is either lying or dancing.

Still, they’ve provided a picture of a skinned penis, so you have to admire their medical credentials. What more proof could you possibly need of the efficacy of a penis enlargement patch?

That said, if, like me, you’re at all curious how a penis enlargement patch might work—specifically, where does it go?—you’ll be glad to know that this guy genuinely received a picture, also via spam, that answers exactly that question.

Comments

[new-brunette.livejournal.com]

Jesus. If that's what my cock will look like afterwards, I think I'll stick with my little acorn, ta.

[g0ldt00th.livejournal.com]

I have a collection of similar spam images, can I steal yours?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/alex_tea/sets/72157600175775735/

[webofevil.livejournal.com]

Of course!

[lowlowprices.livejournal.com]

I spent a goodish portion of my lunch break on Wednesday discussing how one might weigh an erect penis. But the answer we arrived at is indisputably boring and probably wrong, so I won't post it.

[uitlander]

Pity the picture you posted without a cut isn't worksafe. Nor the use of the word 'penis' - most of my lunch ended up on the screen as I shut down the browser. Things like the Clearswift web appliance I used to document would flag that as a serious problem. Please, please use a LJ cut in future.

[webofevil.livejournal.com]

Apologies. It's easy to forget about that sort of thing when you work somewhere that doesn't have that policy.

> the word 'penis'... the Clearswift web appliance I used to document would flag that as a serious problem

But what if you were innocently looking up this woman's back catalogue?

[uitlander]

It depends on how they configure the filters, but that might also get flagged as a problem. Then it's down to a companies' individual policies - some would look at the item and allow you to explain yourself. Others could claim you have breached their acceptable use policies and use the disciplinary process - however they choose fit. It all comes down to the employer, how whatever monitoring software they use is configured, and how they choose to implement the policies.

Two years ago I stared in a post where the previous encumbant had been dismissed on the spot for a disciplinary offence, he wasn't even allowed to return to his desk and collect his things - they were sent on. He'd worked there 10+ years. After some months it transpired he had been caught browsing what was termed 'porn'. I have no idea how frequently he had done this, for how long, or the nature of the sites/images involved, but he'd been caught out by monitoring software. It makes you edgey browsing stuff at work. I never login to LJ from there as I don't want my (or my friends) locked posts in their cache - similarly I try and avoid anything potentially problematic - just life I'm afraid.

No-one's said anything, so I assume its not caused an issue at my current place, but the LJ cut is your friend :-)

[neil-scott.livejournal.com]

Could you transfer to Scunthorpe?