(no subject)
May. 11th, 2011 05:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

Lord Low of Dalston [Cross-Bench]:* It appears that [the new disability] assessments will seek to distinguish between those who have not adapted to their disability and those who have and who will be at risk of having their benefit reduced or losing it altogether. Does he not agree that people may have adapted to their disability by reason of the very help that they have received from disability living allowance... and that reduction of benefit for those who have adapted to their disability may, in fact, be self-defeating and undermine the integration into the community of the very people the benefit was designed to help?I’m so glad I never have to mix with these people. You can just imagine the dinner party conversations: “... and of course they’re all fit to work; half of them spend their time running up bloody Kilimanjaro, while I get tired out just climbing all the stairs in Daddy’s house. And no-one’s paying me to do that, are they?"
Lord Freud [Conservative; Minister, DWP]: My Lords, this is clearly a quite nuanced issue. There are people who are climbing Mount Kenya on prosthetic limbs who are, I suspect, less challenged than many of us would be in doing that. It does not make sense to go on treating them as disabled in any way, although they may need ongoing support to keep that particular disability support going.
* The only blind peer in the House.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-11 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-12 08:28 am (UTC)