Dec. 5th, 2011

webofevil: (Default)
It's an exciting time to be in teaching. On the one hand, there exist Ofsted inspectors who will penalise you if you did not mention diversity and health and safety during the lesson that was being evaluated, whatever the subject you were actually trying to teach. I'd love to be able to say that was frivolous hyperbole on my part, true withering satire worthy of Clarkson himself, but it's an actual current example from further education.

But, you cry, what about the other hand? Well, it turns out to have a hole in it. Due to Britain's moral collapse, the government are sending bibles into every school with a new introduction by Education Secretary Michael Gove. As yet there is no word as to whether the Education Secretary plans any expansion of the scheme, but I await developments with interest.


Many UK schools have not yet allowed themselves to be bounced into becoming Govean “free” schools. Their resistance is an affront and ultimately futile: a new curriculum is being introduced for them, with virtually every lesson so hopelessly micromanaged that it is utterly impracticable, while private companies are waging a ceaseless offensive—sometimes charming, sometimes not—against the boards of dissenting schools. The practical and financial pressures being exerted on schools to transform tell their own story about how desirable it really is to become a “free” school (apparently we're not letting the market decide here after all) but will ultimately prove too much for most.

Amusingly, Michael Gove's vision of a “free” school is a school where he gets to dictate exactly what children must be taught about family life—so, not quite as free as we would have had you believe. Conservatives are said to be delighted at the news that “free” schools and academies must promote marriage, although I haven't seen any figures for whether these delighted Conservatives include the gay ones[1] and the single parents. Now there can be no argument, since it will be official policy, that marriage is simply the best and most important thing that ever can possibly happen, and any other form of family unit is grotesquely deformed and irredeemably deficient. My esteemed colleague put it best (she often does):
“In my experience, the extent to which a man goes on and on about the importance of marriage in general, and of his marriage in particular, is in direct proportion to the likelihood that later on he will touch my bottom in the kitchen.”
Still, at least there's no reason to doubt the government's word when they assure us it's sensible that any academy or “free” school that passes its Ofsted inspection with flying colours will not then have to be inspected again. The only reason for an inspection afterwards would be if, essentially, someone pulled the emergency cord, and you can imagine there might be quite some pressure from a private concern not to do so. But this is simply to save money and lift a restrictive burden from the government's flagship schools; in no way would it enable flaws and failing standards in those schools to remain usefully undetected.

As the riots this summer showed us, what our schools urgently need is to be freed from the manacles of old discredited educational theories and immediately re-manacled to even older discredited educational theories. “There are just too many sodding arbitrary HR targets,” teachers are saying up and down the country. “Where's a toxic deluge of ideological flummery and righteous hypocrisy when we need it?” Don't fret, gentle toilers, your parched days in the desert are at an end. Here comes the rain.



[1] As [livejournal.com profile] chiller has pointed out, gay people of course can't marry, and Gove's fundamentalist preaching on marriage ensures that gay children, like generations before them, will be learning the important lesson that they are inherently worse than the other, normal children around them. Mind you, since they came to power the coalition have gone out of their way to teach disabled people of all ages this exact lesson so I suppose they're consistent here, as long as you accept being gay as a disability.
webofevil: (all hail)
       

       


webofevil: (Default)
When I saw the first adverts a couple of months ago for a new “Health Lottery”, I thought it must be some kind of heavy-handed satire—a poor cousin of the Life Neutral poster campaign at this year's DSEI arms fair. The Health Lottery turned out to have been set up by Murdoch-wannabe Richard Desmond, which was hardly a better outcome.

The fact that this scheme was Desmond's baby should have piqued my curiosity and I'm kicking myself that I didn't go and look it up properly. Never mind that instead of the 50p in the pound that's usual for lotteries, the Health Lottery gives only 20p in the pound to its chosen good causes—rules on compliance and transparency mean that barely five minutes of internet research confirms what Lord Faulkner said in the Lords last Monday:
Lord Faulkner of Worcester: … is [the Minister] aware of the great concern that has been expressed by the beneficiaries of legally run society lotteries in the health sector, which have benefited immensely from those local society lotteries, about what is seen as the unfair competition from the Health Lottery?... Secondly, notwithstanding what the Gambling Commission may have decided initially about the Health Lottery's legality, how can it be legal to have 51 community interest companies linked to the Health Lottery which have no independent existence, but which all have the same three directors and all operate out of the same virtual office? How is that legal? [Hansard]
Sure enough, the Health Lottery's “About us” page carries a truly Orwellian list of names of the 51 “local” lotteries it funds: HealthEngage (Dumfries, Gallowayshire etc); HealthBelief (Northants, Leicestershire); HealthBright (Solihull & Birmingham); HealthAble (Cumbria and Northumberland); HealthImprove, HealthWhole, HealthControl, HealthTotal, HealthPerfect, HealthWisdom, HealthLevel etc, all of them operating out of “Suite 15799”, 145-157 St John Street, London. The websites that I've looked at are pretty much identical and this is a typical compliance page.[1]


The government's response was, characteristically, to say that this was nothing to do with the government but was entirely under the oversight of the Gambling Commission, which was content to issue a licence to the Health Lottery in the first place. However, the minister was at great pains, with a nod, a wink and a judicious phrase, to point out that the commission is due to report in the spring on whether it is content that the Health Lottery is not a massive and insulting scam[2], and “the government are monitoring the situation”.

Until the commission reports and we discover whether or not “Suite 15799” is after all a more effective provider than the state in meeting local health needs, should you be grasped by the urge to play some kind of good-cause-related lottery, please bear in mind that there might be one or two more deserving causes than the man who owns the Daily Star.



[1] Highlight: “Grants are sometimes made in instalments to ensure all money is being used for the intended purpose.” In other words, although we might appear only to have spent £3.50 on some aspirin, we're actually just waiting for the moment to release the second tranche of funding. Just you wait. Any minute now. Any... minute...

[2] Not the Gambling Commission's actual wording.

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 12:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios