May. 29th, 2009

webofevil: (Default)
A noteworthy peril of running a blog in a language other than your native one is that you might not speak enough of it to know when a review of a band whose album you’re encouraging people to buy is less than favourable:
About Arms And Sleepers (THE MOTORIST EP OUT NOW!):

“… But first, we had to sit through a nearly hour-long set by the execrable duo (plus occasional drummer) Arms and Sleepers. If they play your town, avoid them at all costs—unless you’re partial to soporific Stereolab wannabes (minus interesting melodies, rhythmic complexity, and artful arrangements). They’re the electronic instantiation of Spinal Tap’s Jazz Odyssey.

“I hated their use of fey, superfluous novelty instruments (little xylophone, little accordion, melodica with creepy length of tubing, thumb piano). I hated the keyboardist’s stupid muttonchops and beard and his “oh I am so into this that I just can’t control it” headbanging. I hated the bassist’s near-constant pelvic thrusting. I hated the screen-saver film loops and handheld footage of power lines and trees. I hated their constant twiddling and fiddling with laptops and gadgets. I hate how they only list their own records under “Influences” on their MySpace page and they peddle their merch under “Sounds Like.” And oh, how I hate the band bio d. dug up:

“‘Arms and Sleepers started one night in the back of an ambulance destined for Hampton Road in Boston’s South Side. In an alleyway a man was bleeding with a cassette player in hand, the play button still on. What sounded like recordings of a gospel choir blared from the tin speaker while down the street, a jazz band could be heard. The man was dying. He dropped the cassette player on the cement and closed his eyes, the sound carrying through the air into his ears for one last time. Though this moment in time died with him, his cassette lived on, and Arms and Sleepers was born.’

“They must be stopped.” (ROCK SOUND LIVE REVIEW)
webofevil: (Default)
Drawing perspective is difficult, isn’t it? Really quite difficult. Maybe that’s why the artist appears not to have put his name to this portrait of Sir William Langley, credited only to the “British School 1600-1699”:

I mean, seriously. I suspect there’s a reason this is an Alan Smithee picture:

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 11:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios