![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
The kid stays in the picture
Jun. 7th, 2011 11:30 amAlongside a story in its sports pages a couple of weeks ago, the Sunday Times ran a photo of a rugby scrum. The oddity that it contains is barely visible in the small version that it ran online and could easily have gone unnoticed:
However, the same image in the print edition was much bigger, allowing keen-eyed readers to spot this:
Is that a child? Who photoshopped a child in there? Was it to spare the blushes of Sunday Times readers because of a rogue cock adrift in the scrum? Was the picture editor hoping one day to sell the image on eBay for a vastly inflated price because it’s “haunted”? Or is the Sunday Times running some kind of competition, in which case what do we win?
However, the same image in the print edition was much bigger, allowing keen-eyed readers to spot this:
Is that a child? Who photoshopped a child in there? Was it to spare the blushes of Sunday Times readers because of a rogue cock adrift in the scrum? Was the picture editor hoping one day to sell the image on eBay for a vastly inflated price because it’s “haunted”? Or is the Sunday Times running some kind of competition, in which case what do we win?
