2005-11-21

webofevil: (whuh?)
2005-11-21 09:03 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

If you come across this picture:



... and you clock its domain name, "proz.com", what's the first thing that's going to go through your mind?

You're wrong.
webofevil: (Default)
2005-11-21 10:50 am
Entry tags:

By popular demand

Regulation of Investigatory Powers Bill, 19 June 2000
Lord Lucas: Surely we are seeking the production of a record here? That is the crucial element. An authorisation should be recorded so that later it can be audited, as the Minister pointed out. If I scribble an authorisation enabling someone to do something on a piece of tissue paper and that person then proceeds to eat it, a record will not have been produced. (...)

Lord Bach: The noble Lord's amendments would allow notices to be given in writing or by electronic means since the Bill already requires that authorisations or notices must be given in a manner which produces a record of their having been granted. We cannot think of any other way presently available by which notices or authorisations could be produced. (...)

Lord Lucas: What we are asking for here is that a record is made... As I said a moment ago, I could write down the authorisation on rice paper only to have it eaten or lost in a file. No requirement is in place to produce a record if the authorisation is granted in writing. (...)

Lord Bach: Obviously, the fact that an authorisation is written ensures that a record is made. What is done with the record is properly a matter for the code of practice. I think that is the best I can do on this point at this hour of night.